All builds Book a call
Construction · Japan · Kamata Koumuten · Live 2026-05-09

A Japanese construction company's site, rebuilt in its own language, then referred to the whole industry board.

Unreadable text over photos, a broken mobile layout, and a Google listing pointing at the wrong domain. Now a storefront that brings in referral work.

6pages rebuilt for mobile and desktop, verified live 6 of 6 on every deploy
1industry board referral: a regional construction association board member is recommending the site to the whole board
The rebuilt homepage on desktop
The rebuilt homepage.
What was broken

Before

An outdated site with unreadable text over photos, a broken mobile layout, a Google listing pointing at the wrong domain, and a contact form that had never delivered a single inquiry. Every content change meant emailing photos to a developer and waiting days.

What I built

The build

What changed

Before and after

Before

By hand
Reading it on a phoneBroken layout
GoogleWrong domain
DeployingEmail a developer, wait
ReferralsNone from the site

After

The system
Reading it on a phoneBuilt mobile first
GoogleSearch Console + profile fixed
DeployingOne command, verified 6 of 6
ReferralsAn industry board member recommending it
Where the numbers come from. Six pages is the whole site. The referral is one board member's active recommendation; no board contract has been signed.
For engineers

How it's built

Architecture
A static site on the client's existing shared PHP host, deployed by mirror with a backup taken first and a health check of every page after.
Where it runs
The client's own hosting. Nothing of ours in the loop.
Tests and evals
Every deploy verifies all 6 pages return 200 and the search-console verification file is intact.
Cost and latency
The client's existing hosting. No new subscriptions.
Guardrails
Never delete the search-console verification file. Backup before every mirror. The deploy script changes into the directory first, because the mirror tool silently no-ops on paths with spaces.
The tradeoff we chose
Why this way and not the other

Kept their host and a static site instead of moving them to a builder. The owner's team is not technical; the cheapest thing to maintain is a folder of HTML they own, plus a small CMS later for the one job they actually do themselves: posting a finished project.

Keep going